The construction of large corporate headquarters and skyscrapers often turns out to be a sign of an economic peak. The Empire State Building was planned, and construction began, at the onset of the Great Depression. The Willis Tower, originally known as the Sears Tower, began construction right before the stock market crash of 1973-74. (Soon after, Wal-Mart, which eventually disrupted Sears’s business model, began trading as a public company.) The Burj Khalifa in Dubai, currently the tallest building in the world, was under construction as the global financial crisis began in 2008.
That history gives a bit of an ominous feel to the new $5 billion headquarters for Apple in Silicon Valley. The most valuable publicly traded company in the world unveiled its iPhone X earlier this month, with the highest price tag yet — almost $1,000. So many superlatives. It certainly sounds like peak … something.
For decades, the southern portion of the San Francisco Bay Area, now known as Silicon Valley, has been a global hub of innovation and a breeding ground of large technology companies. Apple was famously founded in a Los Altos, California, garage at the childhood home of Steve Jobs, before eventually moving to Cupertino. Yahoo was founded at Stanford University and later moved to Sunnyvale. EBay’s headquarters is in San Jose. Google’s is in Mountain View. Facebook’s is in Menlo Park.
What started as an industry based in suburban office parks has evolved into large self-contained campuses as the industry has grown more profitable and powerful. So perhaps it’s no surprise that Apple would have the most extravagant headquarters of them all, with its vast, circular campus signaling both infinity and permanence, reminiscent of an alien spaceship that has landed to create a futuristic Stonehenge.
Yet Silicon Valley may no longer be the wisest geographical bet, even for a company as profitable and powerful as Apple. While the technology industry is more powerful than ever and its largest companies continue to grow, the geography they call home increasingly looks tapped out. Employment in the San Jose metro area had its largest drop in August in seven years. It’s fallen in four of the eight months in 2017, and sits at a level not much higher than it reached at the peak of the dot-com boom almost 17 years ago.
While wage growth in the region remains strong, and unemployment hovers at a low level of 3.5 percent, the labor force has begun to shrink, indicating that one of the strongest labor markets in the country is no longer bringing people in.
The culprit is familiar: the housing market. While the San Francisco Bay Area boasts one of the world’s finest combinations of economy, climate and culture, voters and politicians in the region have resisted permitting increased density and housing to go along with the job growth fostered by the technology industry. While it’s possible these political attitudes may change, it’s not a bet I would make, and it’s also not one that should be made by large companies looking to secure an adequate workforce to support their growth.
It’s understandable that companies like Apple would resist adapting to these economic realities. The largest technology companies make billions of dollars a year and can afford to pay above-market rates to secure top talent in the Bay Area. And until now, most of the best tech jobs, and tech talent, have been in the Bay Area, ensuring a vibrant labor market ecosystem even as housing costs spiraled higher and higher.
But everything has its limits. Amazon, in its decision to build a second headquarters somewhere other than Seattle, may have kicked off a new geographic era for the technology industry. Over time other talent clusters will grow in lower-cost regions. Whether it’s in a couple of years or a couple of decades, eventually today’s tech titans will feel economic pressure to cut costs and restructure, just as every company and every industry before it has. And when that moment comes, Apple’s glamorous new headquarters, rather than feeling like a spaceship, may feel more like the Titanic.
Conor Sen is a Bloomberg View columnist.
Source : http://www.postandcourier.com/opinion/commentary/is-silicon-valley-peaking/article_900617b6-9d7e-11e7-a909-8301730a7259.html